{"id":4590,"date":"2018-06-12T09:08:27","date_gmt":"2018-06-12T09:08:27","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.art-3.org\/art-contemporain\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/31-dector.jpg"},"modified":"2018-06-12T09:11:09","modified_gmt":"2018-06-12T09:11:09","slug":"31-dector","status":"inherit","type":"attachment","link":"http:\/\/www.art-3.org\/art-contemporain\/dector-dupuy.php\/31-dector","title":{"rendered":"31-dector"},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":[],"class_list":["post-4590","attachment","type-attachment","status-inherit","hentry"],"description":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

\t
<\/form> \t
\t\tTELECHARGER L\\'ARTICLE AU FORMAT PDF<\/a> \t<\/div> <\/div>"},"caption":{"rendered":"

Arles \/ Bord du Rh\u00f4ne \/09\/06\/2018
\nAffaire Milka \/ Bourg-l\u00e8s-Valence\/d\u00e9cembre 2001 (michel dector).
\nL’affaire milka.fr est un conflit qui a oppos\u00e9 la couturi\u00e8re Milka B. de Bourg-l\u00e8s-Valence, \u00e0 la multinationale am\u00e9ricaine Kraft Foods, concernant l’attribution de la propri\u00e9t\u00e9 du nom de domaine\u00ab milka.fr \u00bb, conform\u00e9ment au droit des marques en France.
\nEn effet, en d\u00e9cembre 2001, Madame Milka Budimir s’\u00e9tait vu offrir comme cadeau de No\u00ebl par ses enfants le nom de domaine milka.fr, en tant que vitrine de son activit\u00e9 de couture. Le g\u00e9ant de l’alimentaire Kraft Foods, propri\u00e9taire du chocolat Milka, a alors rapidement fait pression sur la couturi\u00e8re pour qu’elle abandonne la propri\u00e9t\u00e9 de milka.fr.
\nLe 14 mars 2005, au bout de trois ans de ce que MmeB. a qualifi\u00e9 en substance d’acharnement judiciaire et de harc\u00e8lements divers, cette affaire a trouv\u00e9 son \u00e9pilogue. Bien que l’adresse milka.fr ait \u00e9t\u00e9 obtenue de mani\u00e8re l\u00e9gale et l\u00e9gitime, et que le site aff\u00e9rant ne nuise aucunement au chocolat Milka, un tribunal fran\u00e7ais a ordonn\u00e9 de c\u00e9der la propri\u00e9t\u00e9 du site internet milka.fr \u00e0 la multinationale am\u00e9ricaine Kraft Foods propri\u00e9taire de la marque de chocolat Milka.<\/p>\n

Le tribunal de grande instance de Nanterre (choisi par Kraft pour sa r\u00e9putation d’accorder des dommages et int\u00e9r\u00eats \u00e9lev\u00e9s)a en effet estim\u00e9 qu’\u00ab en r\u00e9servant et utilisant le nom de domaine milka.fr, Mme Milka B. a fait un emploi injustifi\u00e9 des marques d\u00e9nominatives Milka dont la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 Kraft Foods est propri\u00e9taire \u00bb. De plus, le tribunal de Nanterre n’a relev\u00e9 \u00ab aucune faute de Kraft Foods dans l’utilisation du nom Milka qui existait bien avant la naissance de Mme B. \u00bb. L’avocat de Milka B. a alors d\u00e9clar\u00e9 : \u00ab le droit des marques l’emporte sur le droit de la personne, les prologos diront bravo et les no-logo seront d\u00e9\u00e7us \u00bb. Ma\u00eetre Eolas, quant \u00e0 lui, a affirm\u00e9 qu’\u00ab il s'[agissait] donc d’une d\u00e9cision conforme au droit des marques, dont on peut regretter qu’elle ait d\u00fb \u00eatre prononc\u00e9e, ce genre de litige \u00e9tant absurde et d\u00e9risoire, et devant id\u00e9alement se r\u00e9soudre par la n\u00e9gociation\u00bb.<\/p>\n

Finalement, en avril 2006, Milka B. a d\u00e9finitivement perdu contre Kraft Foods devant la cour d’appel de Versailles. L’usage de la couleur violette sur le site milka.fr semblant avoir \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9cisif.<\/p>\n

Continuer la lecture →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n"},"alt_text":"","media_type":"image","mime_type":"image\/jpeg","media_details":{"width":1681,"height":1706,"file":"2017\/12\/31-dector.jpg","sizes":{"thumbnail":{"file":"31-dector-150x150.jpg","width":150,"height":150,"mime_type":"image\/jpeg","source_url":"http:\/\/www.art-3.org\/art-contemporain\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/31-dector-150x150.jpg"},"medium":{"file":"31-dector-296x300.jpg","width":296,"height":300,"mime_type":"image\/jpeg","source_url":"http:\/\/www.art-3.org\/art-contemporain\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/31-dector-296x300.jpg"},"medium_large":{"file":"31-dector-768x779.jpg","width":768,"height":779,"mime_type":"image\/jpeg","source_url":"http:\/\/www.art-3.org\/art-contemporain\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/31-dector-768x779.jpg"},"large":{"file":"31-dector-1009x1024.jpg","width":1009,"height":1024,"mime_type":"image\/jpeg","source_url":"http:\/\/www.art-3.org\/art-contemporain\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/31-dector-1009x1024.jpg"},"post-thumbnail":{"file":"31-dector-940x198.jpg","width":940,"height":198,"mime_type":"image\/jpeg","source_url":"http:\/\/www.art-3.org\/art-contemporain\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/31-dector-940x198.jpg"},"full":{"file":"31-dector.jpg","width":1681,"height":1706,"mime_type":"image\/jpeg","source_url":"http:\/\/www.art-3.org\/art-contemporain\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/31-dector.jpg"}},"image_meta":{"aperture":"2.2","credit":"","camera":"iPhone 6s Plus","caption":"","created_timestamp":"1528540456","copyright":"","focal_length":"4.15","iso":"25","shutter_speed":"0.0012345679012346","title":"","orientation":"0","keywords":[]}},"post":4235,"source_url":"http:\/\/www.art-3.org\/art-contemporain\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/31-dector.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.art-3.org\/art-contemporain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4590","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.art-3.org\/art-contemporain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.art-3.org\/art-contemporain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/attachment"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.art-3.org\/art-contemporain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.art-3.org\/art-contemporain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4590"}],"wp:attached-to":[{"embeddable":true,"post_type":"post","id":4235,"href":"http:\/\/www.art-3.org\/art-contemporain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4235"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}